-
Join 35,449 other subscribers
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- cutting and pasting early text into the thesis – part 2.
- can you cut and paste early text into your thesis?
- developing a research agenda
- getting to grips with PSA – Pre Submission Angst
- writing on the fly
- on alt writing
- does the find-a-journal beta service work?
- academic writing knowhow – setting the scene
- the end of AcWriMo – now what?
- revising drafts – #AcWriMo
- Are long sentences always bad? #AcWriMo
- not writing as usual #AcWriMo
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing acwrimo argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- cutting and pasting early text into the thesis - part 2.
- writing a bio-note
- avoiding the laundry list literature review
- 20 reading journal prompts
- can you cut and paste early text into your thesis?
- flip your presentation format
- five ways to structure a literature review
- developing a research agenda
- looping - a free writing strategy for generating ideas
Meta
Search Results for: conclusion
does a thesis conclusion have “recommendations”?
I’ve seen many a thesis which concludes with a set of recommendations that arise from the research. This practice troubles me. I’ve got two basic concerns about putting recommendations in a thesis conclusion. My position may be a bit contentious … Continue reading
Posted in conclusion, recommendations, thesis
Tagged conclusion, implications, Pat Thomson, recommendations, thesis
1 Comment
concluding well – part 2. on back rows and beautiful houses
Imagine yourself in a theatre. You choose to sit in the back row. You are the author of the play to be performed, and you have crept into the stalls after the lights go down. It is opening night and … Continue reading
Posted in conclusion, text work/identity work
Tagged conclusion, Pat Thomson, text work identity work
Leave a comment
concluding well, part 1 – the big air problem
Big air? Well yes, I have been sporadically watching the Winter Olympics. And if you have too, you’ll know that big air is the term used to describe events where a highly skilled and very brave person takes a big … Continue reading
Posted in claims, conclusion, implications of research
Tagged big air, claims, conclusions, implications, Pat Thomson, So What Now What
3 Comments
concluding a paper
Conclusions can be hard. There are a few big traps that conclusion writers can fall into. In order to avoid them, try the following three things. Deep breath. It’s good to be bold. The conclusion generally requires bigging up what … Continue reading
Posted in conclusion, journal article, so what
Tagged conclusion, journal article, Pat Thomson, so what
3 Comments
“showing” and “telling” in the thesis
The thesis must show and tell your examiner that its writer is ready to be called Dr. Yep. Dr (insert your surname here.) What do I mean by show and tell? Well, even if these are not the usual definitions, … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, audit trail, conclusion, introduction, literature reviews, methods, show and tell, thesis
Tagged academic writing, audit trail, conclusion, introduction, literature, methods, show and tell, thesis
1 Comment
cutting and pasting early text into the thesis – part 2.
So you are writing your thesis about the research that you have done. And what you write now is is likely to be a little different from the expanded proposal you wrote to confirm your candidature. And a little different … Continue reading
Posted in literature review, revision, thesis, thesis revision
Tagged academic writing, cut and paste, Pat Thomson, revising, rewriting, thesis
Leave a comment
not reading everything
Last week was the first week of teaching. New class. New co-teacher. And for the third year running, the course has been redesigned. From a mix of online and face to face, to all on line, and now all face … Continue reading
Posted in literature mapping, literature reviews, reading, scan-reading
Tagged Literatures, Pat Thomson, reading, reading choices
5 Comments
make your case stronger – argue against yourself
Argument is crucial to academic writing. It’s argue argue argue all the way. Once we have identified a problem or puzzle that we think is worth researching, we then make a case for research, creating the warrant for our work. … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, argument
Tagged academic writing, argument, negatives, Pat Thomson, revision strategies
2 Comments
why journal articles get rejected – #3
Every journal article is expected to make a contribution. The writer has to say something that adds to the conversation about the particular topic in the target journal. And through this addition, they participate in the discussion in the field. … Continue reading
Posted in contribution, journal article, peer review, rejection, significance
Tagged contribution, journal article, Pat Thomson, peer reveiw, rejection, significance
1 Comment
revising? start strategically
Whether you are revising your own writing or responding to reviewer feedback, you need to work out what to do. But you also need to work out where to start. You may have made a revising plan or written out … Continue reading
Posted in crappy first draft, peer review, revision, revision strategy
Tagged communication, Pat Thomson, revision, revision strategy
Leave a comment