-
Join 35,109 other followers
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- unlearning who you are and what you know? starting the doctorate
- starting the doctorate – finding good advice
- forced rest
- how to talk about writing…
- a book about style and form
- last-minute proofing – 12 things to look for
- patter’s diary
- should you highlight the paper you’re reading?
- propositional density – a helpful steer on writing and revising
- using the progressive disclosure principle in academic writing
- anonymisation – what’s in a name?
- everyday annotation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- what's a #phd 'contribution'?
- writing a bio-note
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- unlearning who you are and what you know? starting the doctorate
- bad research questions
- what does " connect your work to an ongoing conversation" mean?
- why is writing a literature review such hard work? part one
- my research
Meta
Search Results for: questions approach
what’s all this reading about then – starting the PhD
When you begin the PhD you will be told to read, and read a lot. But you’ll find not any old approach to reading will do. It’s a particular kind of reading that’s expected. So it’s important to get a … Continue reading
Posted in literature mapping, literature review, PhD, reading, Reading, starting the PhD
Tagged literature review, literature work, mapping, Pat Thomson, reading, starting the PhD
1 Comment
can you say something about the “theory chapter”?
I’ve been asked about writing a theory chapter. But should I say anything? I feel a bit iffy about the very idea. What to do? Take your own advice here. Write for ten minutes about a theory chapter. Write about … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, theory, theory chapter, thesis
Tagged Pat Thomson, theory, theory chapter
2 Comments
a qual. research strategy – empathy mapping
I dont write much about research methods on this blog. That’s not because I’m not interested in research methods – I’ve published three methods texts, after all – but more because I’m pretty sure people who come here mainly want … Continue reading
Posted in data, data analysis, empathy mapping, qualitative data
Tagged analysis, data, empathy mapping, Pat Thomson, qualitative research
7 Comments
the thesis discussion – making the move work
This post comes back again at the discussion “chapter”. It seems you can never say too much about this tricky bit of the thesis. A caveat before I start. This post is written from a social science perspective and offers … Continue reading
Posted in argument, discussion, thesis
Tagged argument, Pat Thomson, results and discussion, thesis, writing the discussion
1 Comment
my supervisor expects me to keep revising – why?
I often hear doctoral researchers asking this question. They’ve sent their supervisor some writing. It’s come back with feedback and suggestions and maybe actual corrections. The doc. researcher has attended to all of these and sent the revised text back … Continue reading
why journal articles are rejected #2
Here’s the thing. Journal Editors say that one of the major reasons that papers are rejected is when the writer is not clear about their point, and their argument. Accepted journal articles have a point to make. They work with … Continue reading
Posted in argument, journal article, rejection, the point
Tagged argument, journal article, Pat Thomson, rejection, structured abstract, the point
Leave a comment
a festive gift from patter – a checklist for revising methods chapters
PhDers sometimes find writing the thesis methods chapter a pretty tedious business. But the methods chapter is a key part of the examination process – it shows that the researcher knows how to research. You see, examiners make their decision … Continue reading
what is an audit trail and why do you need one?
The term audit trail is shorthand. i use it to describe “evidential” material that you provide for a reader. I am a bit suspicious of the overuse of the word evidence, and I prefer “audit” because it describes what actually … Continue reading
patter 