-
Join 35,693 other subscribers
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- story and academic writing – the question of pace
- Story structure 2 – research writing
- Story and research writing
- when your writing plan gets stuck
- Planning and writing
- the planning fallacy and the PhD
- five discussion chapter challenges
- making the case for your research
- useless ideas
- academic writing as conversation
- AI and all that jazz
- thinking about collaborations
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing acwrimo argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD planning publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice
Top Posts & Pages
- story and academic writing - the question of pace
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- writing a bio-note
- five ways to structure a literature review
- use a structured abstract to help write and revise
- what's a #phd 'contribution'?
- 20 reading journal prompts
- avoiding the laundry list literature review
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- Story structure 2 - research writing
Meta
Search Results for: self-citation
writing a journal article – how many references?
I’ve been asked about how many references go in the literature section of a journal article. A supervisor had offered a view – one reference per sentence is best, perhaps two. But, the person asking me said, they had seen papers … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, citation, citations, journal article, literature review
Tagged citations, journal article, Pat Thomson, references
7 Comments
self-citation by proxy
Meet Dr Oozing-Confidence. He knows his work is important. Very important. Superior even. He gets very miffed when he reads anything that is on his topic, or connected with it, that doesn’t recognise his contributions and their significance. He is always keen … Continue reading
Posted in conversation, journal article, peer review, self-citation
Tagged conversation, Pat Thomson, peer review, self-citation
5 Comments
citing yourself – in the text
Writing about your own work is sometimes tricky. There are ‘secretarial’ text issues involved in using your own work. I’ll talk here about how you refer to yourself and the work, and the vexed question of self-plagiarism. writing your work … Continue reading
Posted in self promotion, self-citation, self-plagiarism, Uncategorized
Tagged Pat Thomson, self-citation, self-plagiarism
9 Comments
citing yourself – how much is too much?
Should you cite yourself? Ever? Never? Sometimes, and if sometimes, when? And how much? When does sometimes become just too much altogether? There are mixed views on self-citation. Some people think that it’s quite unseemly to cite yourself at all … Continue reading
Posted in academic selfie, self-citation
Tagged academic selfie, Pat Thomson, self promotion, self-citation
4 Comments
not writing as usual #AcWriMo
A lot of writing advice focuses on how to be more productive. Write more. Write fast. Write often. Write regularly. Write better. Do we really need this? Well, probably. Writing is important for getting a job, getting a promotion, getting … Continue reading
Posted in acwrimo, experiment, pleasure
Tagged academic writing, acwrimo, creative writing, experiment, Pat Thomson, pleasure
Leave a comment
recycling your thesis text – is it self plagiarism?
The term self-plagiarism is usually associated with re-using your own work, recycling slabs of material already published, cutting and pasting from one text to another, producing something which duplicates something that has already appeared elsewhere. Self-plagiarism is not the same … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, plagiarism, re-use, self-plagiarism, thesis
Tagged Pat Thomson, self-plagiarism, text recycling, Text Recycling Project, thesis
4 Comments
dealing with rejection
This is a guest post from Dan Cleather. Dan is a strength coach, educator, scientist and anarchist. His latest book, “Subvert! A philosophical guide for the 21st century scientist”, was published in May. Being an academic requires a thick skin. Very … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, peer review, rejection, research funding
Tagged Dan Cleather, peer review, rejection, research funding
4 Comments
revising like a reader
Academic writing is generally intended to be persuasive. The writer – let’s say that’s us – wants to put a proposition to the reader, and convince them that what we have presented is credible. Our writing is worth taking seriously … Continue reading
Posted in reader, revision, revision strategy
Tagged Pat Thomson, reader, revision, revision strategy
3 Comments
required, desirable and delightful elements of academic writing
This is the time of year that I run writing workshops and courses. And because I’m preoccupied with teaching, I’m also thinking about new and different strategies for authoring and revision. Authoring and revision strategies are inter-related – heuristics used … Continue reading
Posted in examiner, Kano Analysis, revision, thesis
Tagged authoring, examiner, Kano Analysis, Pat Thomson, revision, thesis
4 Comments
writing advice – caveat emptor
Advice. Loads of it. Coming out of our ears. And on every possible topic, including research and writing. Advice needs readers. But we readers also need to be, as Ernest Hemingway put it, “crap detectors”. Howard Rheingold has worked up … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, advice, crap detection, Howard Rheingold, poor advice
Tagged advice, crap detection, Howard Rheingold
2 Comments