-
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patterFollow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
Copyright
Patter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging book proposal books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology ethics examiner introduction journal journal article literature review literature themes mess methods chapter peer review PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research methods research project revision signposts supervision Tate Summer School thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
-
Recent Posts
- day one #tatesummerschool
- it’s that time of year…
- #co-editing – a manuscript to publication checklist
- #co-editing – getting the proposal together
- another year, another post
- #readingforwriting: being specific in qualitative research
- academic publishing in English
- you’re so vague…
- making the familiar strange – two book recommendations
- three things examiners look for in methods chapters
- blogging in the growlery
- when peer review is scent marking
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- it's that time of year...
- refereeing a journal article. part 3. writing the feedback
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
- good academic writing – it's about revision not editing
- connecting chapters/chapter conclusions
- #readingforwriting: being specific in qualitative research
Meta
Category Archives: abstracts
finishing the phd – write a Tiny Text
You’ve finally finished your data generation and analysis. What next? Oh, it’s the big text… but working out how to move now, working out how to structure the thesis … well it can feel a bit like trying to fight your … Continue reading
confessions of a crabby conference abstract reviewer
Jonathan Downie is a conference interpreter, researcher and writer based in Edinburgh, Scotland. His PhD was at Heriot-Watt University and examined stakeholder expectations of interpreters. He recently passed his viva. He tweets as @jonathanddownie. Dear Person Who Wrote This Abstract, I know … Continue reading
buffering your thesis
I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds it excruciatingly irritating to be in the middle of streaming a video or music and the computer stops and spins its little wheel while it downloads more data. Download download, sigh. And it always happens during the … Continue reading
Posted in abstracts, buffering the thesis, Dave McKenna, storyboarding, thesis
Tagged buffering the thesis, Dave McKenna, Pat Thomson, storyboarding
9 Comments
co-writing the messy first draft
another of those posts where I talk about my own practice… I’m currently engaged in several bits of co-writing. They are not the talk-and-write-together model that I do with Barbara. No, these are variations on the write-together-write-separate process. Because this … Continue reading
Posted in abstracts, co-writing, planning, planning a paper, word budget
Tagged abstract, co-writing, Pat Thomson, planning, talking to write, writing together
5 Comments
writing the thesis abstract
The thesis abstract is the first thing that your examiner reads. It sets the tone of what is to come. On the basis of the abstract alone, before they start the text proper, the examiner will form some expectations about … Continue reading
Posted in abstracts, examiner, reader, thesis abstract
Tagged examiner, Pat Thomson, reader, thesis abstract
9 Comments
the appraisal and rejection of conference abstracts
I had an email recently from an early career researcher who’d just had an abstract for a conference knocked back. When they asked for feedback, they were shocked by what they read. Presumably assuming that the writer would never see … Continue reading
Posted in abstracts, conference papers, early career researchers, peer review, rejection, reviewing
Tagged conference abstract, Pat Thomson, rejection, reviewing
7 Comments
writing course day two
We began today by looking at the abstract again – the Tiny Text – and then went on to think about titles. After some paired discussion of the potential titles and a bit of work on some volunteers’ abstracts and … Continue reading
Posted in abstracts, introduction, Tiny Text, writing course
Tagged abstract, beginning work, Pat Thomson, Tiny Text, writing course
5 Comments
