-
Join 35,466 other subscribers
Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- thinking about collaborations
- a note on acronyms
- using jargon
- line editing – learning from editors
- five focusing questions to kick off some writing
- revising – mark up your text to achieve focus
- cutting and pasting early text into the thesis – part 2.
- can you cut and paste early text into your thesis?
- developing a research agenda
- getting to grips with PSA – Pre Submission Angst
- writing on the fly
- on alt writing
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing acwrimo argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice
Top Posts & Pages
- writing a bio-note
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- avoiding the laundry list literature review
- I'm writing a journal article - what literatures do I choose?
- five focusing questions to kick off some writing
- five ways to structure a literature review
- use a structured abstract to help write and revise
- thinking about collaborations
- concluding the journal article
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
Meta
Tag Archives: Barbara Kamler
why is writing a literature review such hard work? part two
Yes, some examiners do ask doctoral researchers to change their literature review to show how they are “located” in the text. OK, let’s pretend this is you. What do those pesky examiners mean exactly? At one level this is a … Continue reading →
choose your writing partner carefully
We hear a lot about the benefits of collaboration in writing. I’m always banging on about how good it is to have regular writing partners. But not all collaborations work out well. Things can go wrong. People don’t pull their weight. People don’t … Continue reading →
Posted in academic writing, Barbara Kamler
|
Tagged academic writing, Barbara Kamler, co-writing, Pat Thomson
|
10 Comments
paper, thesis and book titles – think ‘key words’ and ‘the point’
We all know that it is now more important than ever to have searchable paper, (digital) thesis and book titles. So, as well as the key word list, titles need to use the kinds of words that will show up … Continue reading →
Posted in argument, James Hartley, keywords, the point, titles
|
Tagged Barbara Kamler, James Hartley, key words, Pat Thomson, the point, titles
|
4 Comments
the proofreading – book update
Barbara and I have just finished the first round of fine-grained proofing on the type-set version of our new “Detox your writing” book. Because we’ve done this proofing lark three times before, we now have a set routine. We first work … Continue reading →
Posted in academic book, Barbara Kamler
|
Tagged Barbara Kamler, Detox your writing, Pat Thomson, Proof-reading
|
2 Comments
text work/identity work
When we write we not only produce text, we also produce ourselves as scholars. As we make textual decisions – what to write about, who to cite and who to leave out, what evidence to include, how we use language … Continue reading →
book blog – our endgame revision and proofing
Barbara and I are now on final descent with our new writing book, Detox your writing. We’ll have it to the publisher sometime next week. Yippee. Our process of final revision and proof-reading has been in several stages. About three … Continue reading →
Posted in Barbara Kamler, book writing, editing, proof-reading, revision
|
Tagged Barbara Kamler, Detox your writing, editing, Pat Thomson, proof reading, revision
|
Leave a comment
writing course: The Literatures
So next to The Literatures. Literatures, a broad term covering anything from the scholarly works to popular texts, social and print media and policy texts. But always including the scholarly materials relevant to the research being reported in the paper. … Continue reading →
book blogging – beginning revision
Barbara and I finished a messy first draft of our new book at the end of November. We are back at it again, this time at a distance from each other. No longer sitting side-by-side, one talking while the other … Continue reading →
Posted in book writing, revision
|
Tagged Barbara Kamler, book writing, Pat Thomson, revision
|
4 Comments
book blogging – it’s done but not dusted
We’ve played The Hallelujah Chorus. We’ve bounced around to Bowie’s Let’s dance. We’ve shouted Ole and Hooray several times. Yes, we’ve finished a first draft. We have 80,000 words or so – 60,000 of which were written in the last … Continue reading →
Posted in book writing, drafting
|
Tagged Barbara Kamler, book writing, crappy first draft, Pat Thomson
|
6 Comments
book blogging – managing tiredness
We’ve now recognised a pattern in this two-days per chapter fast-writing business. The first day is harder than the second. That’s because on the first day we have to work out how to rhetorically frame the chapter and the order that … Continue reading →
patter 