Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
- plan to write – a controlling purpose
- #AcWriMo2020 goals rebooted
- seven prompts for writing with literatures – #startingthePhD
- setting writing goals and targets
- getting into writing – again
- twelve top tips for co-editing a book series
- of publications past, present and future
- beginning the #phd – start writing at the start
- style, tone and grammar – native speaker bias in peer reviews
- #startingthePhD? managing expectations
- #litreview. Defining – It’s your ‘take’
- #litreview – getting to argument, part 2.
CopyrightPatter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELETLOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data doctoral research early career researchers editing ethics examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- plan to write - a controlling purpose
- writing a bio-note
- concluding the journal article
- why is writing a literature review such hard work? part one
- avoiding the laundry list literature review
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- tiny texts - small is powerful
- using metacommentary to specify your contribution: christmas present three
- blank and blind spots in empirical research
Category Archives: journal editor
This is a story told against myself. It’s about doing something that I really, really shouldn’t have done. Before I go on I will just say that the story is actually pretty trivial in the overall state of the world, … Continue reading
So you’ve sent the paper into the journal and now the referee comments are in your in-box. You finally pluck up the courage to open the email and what do you find? Contradictory comments. Not helpful. Not at all. We … Continue reading
One of the most obvious difficulties of a PhD which requires published, rather than publishable, papers is the dependence of the doctoral researcher on the reviewing process. At a very early stage they must brave what can be a lengthy … Continue reading