SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELETLOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
CopyrightPatter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology ethics examiner introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature themes mess methods chapter PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research research methods research project revision signposts supervision Tate Summer School thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
- can you do too much reading?
- starting the #phd – searching the field
- starting the #phd – selling up and leaving home
- doing field work? don’t ignore the anecdote
- starting the phd – money matters
- finishing the phd – write a Tiny Text
- finishing the #PhD – clean-up to get clearer
- coping with writing anxiety – or – learn to stroke your spider
- forget angry birds, make mine angry writing
- starting the PhD – write and write regularly
- the blogging scramble
- starting the PhD – tech matters
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- can you do too much reading?
- what’s with the name doctoral ‘student’?
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- concluding the journal article
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
- starting the phd - money matters
- starting the #phd - searching the field
Category Archives: peer review
I had an email recently from an early career researcher who’d just had an abstract for a conference knocked back. When they asked for feedback, they were shocked by what they read. Presumably assuming that the writer would never see … Continue reading
So you’ve sent the paper into the journal and now the referee comments are in your in-box. You finally pluck up the courage to open the email and what do you find? Contradictory comments. Not helpful. Not at all. We … Continue reading
One of the things that can count for or against you when bidding for research project money is track record. All funders would like to give their money to someone who they are pretty confident can produce the goods. So … Continue reading
I often get asked in workshops whether early career researchers should aim to get into a top journal. I want to give the first two parts of my answer in this post. My first response – WHO IS SAYING THIS … Continue reading
Having read the article carefully, and decided whether it’s accept without change, revise and resubmit or reject, there is now the task of writing the feedback to the author/s. There are four things to keep in mind when writing feedback: … Continue reading
Journals always ask reviewers to recommend whether an article should be published as is, or whether the writer should do small or large revisions. They also ask if the article should be rejected outright. Making a publication recommendation can feel … Continue reading