Tag Archives: peer review

self-citation by proxy

Meet Dr Oozing-Confidence. He knows his work is important. Very important. Superior even. He gets very miffed when he reads anything that is on his topic, or connected with it, that doesn’t recognise his contributions and their significance. He is always keen … Continue reading

Posted in conversation, journal article, peer review, self-citation | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

a case of conflicting reviewer comments

So you’ve sent the paper into the journal and now the referee comments are in your in-box. You finally pluck up the courage to open the email and what do you find? Contradictory comments. Not helpful. Not at all. We … Continue reading

Posted in conflicting reviews, journal, journal editor, peer review, refereeing | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

refereeing a journal article. part 3. writing the feedback

Having read the article carefully, and decided whether it’s accept without change, revise and resubmit or reject, there is now the task of writing the feedback to the author/s. There are four things to keep in mind when writing feedback: … Continue reading

Posted in feedback, journal, peer review, refereeing | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

refereeing a journal article. part 1: reading

So you’ve just got an article to review and you’re not sure how to go about it. Before even beginning to read, the first thing to get clear about is the STANCE you have to take as a reviewer. Once … Continue reading

Posted in journal, peer review, reading, refereeing | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments