-
Join 12.9K other subscribers
patter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- creativity and giving up on knowing it all
- white ants and research education
- Anticipation
- research as creative practice – possibility thinking
- research as – is – creative practice
- On MAL-attribution
- a brief word on academic mobility
- Key word – claim
- key words – contribution
- research key words – significance
- a thesis is not just a display
- should you do a “side project”?
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing acwrimo argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD planning publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice
Top Posts & Pages
- writing a bio-note
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- is public engagement just a nightmare?
- writing the thesis – the theoretical framework
- headings and subheadings – it helps to be specific
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- five ways to structure a literature review
- my supervisor expects me to keep revising - why?
- not all literature ‘reviews’ are the same
Meta
Tag Archives: conventions
I’m writing – but how much detail is enough?
Details, details. More, or less? Doctoral researchers may get feedback from supervisors or reviewers about writing less detail – too much here, be more concise – or conversely more, unpack this or more information needed here. Both types of comment mean you haven’t … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged academic writing, conventions, depth, detail, expectations, format, Pat Thomson
Leave a comment