SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patterFollow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
Copyright
Patter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers editing ethics examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review methods chapter peer review PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research research methods research project revision revision strategy supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
-
Recent Posts
- safety and researchk
- what is “measured” writing?
- make a poster then write your paper
- broadcasting your research
- book writing – an occasional post
- proofreading tactics
- going to a huge conference
- introductions – establishing significance
- revise and resubmit
- giving feedback on writing – be specific
- addressing ‘the gap’ in the field
- mapping a text
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- safety and researchk
- concluding the journal article
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
- make a poster then write your paper
- leave a good last impression - the thesis conclusion
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
Meta
Category Archives: evidence
what is a ‘research warrant’? #knowhow
The notion of a warrant is important in research. It helps to know what the term means, particularly if you get asked a question about your research warrant in, say, a conference presentation or supervision tutorial. Most dictionaries define a … Continue reading
Posted in evidence, research decisions, research design, research methods, research warrant
Tagged Pat Thomson, research warrant
5 Comments
the audit trail – a common omission from methods chapters
It’s really important to put an ‘audit trail’ into your methods chapter. Audit trail? Well, it doesn’t actually matter what you call it, it’s the section in the chapter where you give the examiner the nuts and bolts information about … Continue reading
Posted in evidence, examination criteria, examiner, methodology, methods chapter
Tagged audit trail, methods chapter, Pat Thomson
14 Comments
a tiny tantrum about rules … the case of ‘currency’ for the thesis examiner
Every now and then I get vexed by rules, particularly those that are associated with risk management and quality assurance. This is one of those existential moments. When I am asked by a UK university to be a thesis examiner, … Continue reading
Posted in evidence, examiner, quality, risk management, rules
Tagged appointment of examiners, Pat Thomson, quality assurance, risk management, rules
6 Comments
