Category Archives: evidence

what is a ‘research warrant’? #knowhow

The notion of a warrant is important in research. It helps to know what the term means, particularly if you get asked a question about your research warrant in, say, a conference presentation or supervision tutorial. Most dictionaries define a … Continue reading

Posted in evidence, research decisions, research design, research methods, research warrant | Tagged , | 5 Comments

the audit trail – a common omission from methods chapters

It’s really important to put an ‘audit trail’ into your methods chapter. Audit trail? Well, it doesn’t actually matter what you call it, it’s the section in the chapter where you give the examiner the nuts and bolts information about … Continue reading

Posted in evidence, examination criteria, examiner, methodology, methods chapter | Tagged , , | 14 Comments

a tiny tantrum about rules … the case of ‘currency’ for the thesis examiner

Every now and then I get vexed by rules, particularly those that are associated with risk management and quality assurance. This is one of those existential moments. When I am asked by a UK university to be a thesis examiner, … Continue reading

Posted in evidence, examiner, quality, risk management, rules | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

a methodological metaphor – what detective are you?

One of the basic requirements for research in the humanities and social sciences is that the researcher must take a position. Well not any old position, but one in relation to the practice of research. This is often thought of … Continue reading

Posted in crime fiction, doctoral research, epistemology, evidence, metaphor, methods chapter, ontology, philosophy | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments