Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- categories of literatures work – what’s “new” about researching now
- Ten! Ten! Ten!
- the problem with gap talk
- make your case stronger – argue against yourself
- a qual. research strategy – empathy mapping
- make a poster – it may also help you write a paper
- academic writers as readers
- concluding a paper
- Structuring and sequencing chunks of writing
- the thesis discussion – making the move work
- revising – nine steps for making meaning
- required, desirable and delightful elements of academic writing
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- concluding the journal article
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- connecting chapters/chapter conclusions
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- using metacommentary to specify your contribution: christmas present three
- a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis
- 20 reading journal prompts
- writing the thesis – the theoretical framework
- six differences between thesis and book chapters
Meta
Tag Archives: Howard Rheingold
writing advice – caveat emptor
Advice. Loads of it. Coming out of our ears. And on every possible topic, including research and writing. Advice needs readers. But we readers also need to be, as Ernest Hemingway put it, “crap detectors”. Howard Rheingold has worked up … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, advice, crap detection, Howard Rheingold, poor advice
Tagged advice, crap detection, Howard Rheingold
2 Comments
crap detection and blogging
I’ve got an inbuilt fondness for the encyclopaedia. As a child from a family with a pretty modest income, but one which valued books, Arthur Mee’s Children’s Encyclopaedia took pride of place on the bookshelf. Whether there was a school … Continue reading
Posted in crap detection, Howard Rheingold, Wikipedia, William Cronon
Tagged crap detection, Howard Rheingold, Pat Thomson, Wikipedia, William Cronon
7 Comments
