Follow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
-
Recent Posts
- last-minute proofing – 12 things to look for
- patter’s diary
- should you highlight the paper you’re reading?
- propositional density – a helpful steer on writing and revising
- using the progressive disclosure principle in academic writing
- anonymisation – what’s in a name?
- everyday annotation
- my supervisor expects me to keep revising – why?
- why journal articles get rejected – #3
- finding debates and discussions in the literature
- why journal articles are rejected #2
- why journal articles get rejected #1
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging blogging about blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution data data analysis doctoral research early career researchers editing examiner feedback introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature reviews literature themes methods chapter peer review PhD publishing reader reading research research methods revision revision strategy starting the PhD supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
Top Posts & Pages
- last-minute proofing – 12 things to look for
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- what does " connect your work to an ongoing conversation" mean?
- tactics for proof-reading
- writing a bio-note
- should you highlight the paper you’re reading?
- what's a #phd 'contribution'?
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- concluding the journal article
- thesis knowhow – “the contribution” can create coherence
Meta
Tag Archives: research results
you’re so vague…
It is important when writing about research to be specific. And by writing about research I mean writing about methods in a journal article, writing methods in a thesis or journal article, writing about research design in a research bid. … Continue reading
Posted in claims, research design, results, vagueness
Tagged claims, imprecision, Pat Thomson, research design, research results, vagueness
4 Comments
patter 