what did I do? – the research diary

I’ve got an OK memory. Most of the time I can summon up the details that I need to remember, when I need to remember them – passwords, deadlines, the way home. But I do struggle to recall all of the films I’ve seen, I can’t quite place the name of a novel for love or money and I rely very heavily on Endnote to produce, on call, the details of the things I’ve read. And I am prepared to leave much of what I can’t remember to chance. If the novel was that unforgettable and riveting I’d remember it, right? If I need to tell someone about a television programme and I can’t quite pinpoint the title, I can probably find it via google. And if I do forget one of those very obscure and little-used passwords I can probably reset it.

But I can’t afford to forget the details of my research projects. In a long-term project that runs for over two or three years, there are a myriad of small decisions that get made along the way. They can’t be forgotten. They can’t be left to chance. They must be remembered somehow because all of us need to be able to talk about why the research is the way it is.  It’s VERY important to be able to retrace steps to justify, say, why this site and not another one, why these texts and not others, why these people in particular, why this number and not more or less.

Keeping track of these research project on-the-way decisions is crucial. In order to demonstrate that the research has been conducted rigorously you need to be able to provide a clear rationale for the choices that have been made. In order to establish the research results, you need not only to be able to say what was done and why, but also what wasn’t.

Now, some of these research decisions are deliberate. You choose to draw the line around the research somewhere. It can only go for so long. It can only cover a certain territory. You haven’t got enough person-power to do more than this many. These decisions are usually pretty easy to remember and everyone knows that you have to put them into your research design discussion somewhere, and that you have to refer back to them when you are making the claims at the end about what you ‘found’.

And sometimes this discussion has to cover the things that weren’t planned. For instance, you couldn’t get access to the site you wanted to. The people you wanted to talk to didn’t want to talk to you. The survey return was low. These disappointments and messy bits have to be tracked. The things you did to try to deal with them are part of your research account. PhD examiners are generally pretty forgiving about changes in original plans as long as they are explained – some journal reviewers less so. PhD examiners can actually see a lot about the doctoral researcher from their discussions of coping with mess and unanticipated obstacles.

BUT – well you knew there was going to be a but didn’t you – one of the places where people often forget to keep track of their decisions is when they get to their data analysis. While there is very little room to discuss data analysis in most journal articles, it needs to be part of the audit trail provided in a PhD thesis and in research reports. (The data-analysis-tracking-decisions-discussion doesn’t have to be in the main text, of course, it might be referred to and put into an appendix.) However, reporting the ongoing decisions about data analysis is often overlooked. Yet it can be an area where a lot of small choices are made. Why this theme and not others? Why this code? Why decide that this cross-tabulation would be the way to go, and not another… These analytic choices often take place over time, and they can easily get forgotten in the process of arriving at the final analysis.

These small choices can mount up to something very important in their effect on what has been seen and what can be said about the data. And if you begin the process of data analysis with some systematic trialling of different approaches, the record of those decisions will be important when you come to report back on how you got to the conclusions that you have.

Setting up a research diary to log the ongoing decisions you have made during a research project – including those about analysis –  is important. The research diary can be an important aide-memoire when you finally get to writing your text. And it helps you provide important reassurance to examiners and readers that you have been thorough and thoughtful in the way that you have approached all aspects of the research – not just the design of the project, not just generation of the data, but also in the process of making sense of what you’ve got.

I rely heavily on my research diary. Mine is a big digital folder with running records which I keep on key topics: reading, field work, data analysis. I’m often surprised how much I go back to these files to retrace my steps. The diary file is my external memory, and it’s much more reliable than the internal one!

So, diary on. A research diary might seem like unnecessary record-keeping some of the time, but it will repay the effort in spades just when you are least expecting it. After all, very few of us have 100% retention of everything we do, see, say and hear. Now, where did I put my keys?





About pat thomson

Pat Thomson is Professor of Education in the School of Education, The University of Nottingham, UK
This entry was posted in data analysis, research decisions, research diary and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to what did I do? – the research diary

  1. HSH says:

    This is good advice, but what might a research diary look like in a practical sense? Also, what’s the best format and structure to adopt? What exactly do you write about? I’d love to hear how you keep yours!


  2. Florence says:

    Yes, my question too HSH.
    What programme do you use for your diary? MS Word? Excel, with different sheets for each subsection of notes? Notes on the data analysis programme? How do you cross-reference, say, from reading, to random musings, to Big Decisions that led to Big Changes, to things observed here and there and ideas on the bus?


    • pat thomson says:

      I just keep a simple word file where I list decisions and dates. So I write what I did, why and what happened. These are short entries. There might be a hyperlink through to an observation schedule or something like that, but by and large it’s not too tricksy. I’m sure the diary could be more complex, but I’ve found that simpler works for me. I sometimes have as many as four research projects on the go at once so I don’t have time to do anything but the basic and most important points.


  3. Haitham Al-Sheeshany says:

    Thanks Pat. I will need to remember this while I go into data collection (&, more importantly, data analysis!). Your reply on how to structure the diary is a great one. Simplicity is key I’d say. If I understood you correctly, we need the diary to back up and serve as some sort of an auxiliary to our project. No need to make it a complex side project on its own!


  4. laurammonk says:

    Hi Pat, I realise after reading this post that my methods for reflecting and recording have got way too complex and need simplifying. I have a research log that I is compulsory as it needs to be submitted to my yearly ‘Progress Review Panel’. This is very basic but I’m always thinking I could make it more useful. I keep a reflective journal through which I try to reflect in-depth about all the major events and decisions associated with my project. Additionally, part of the purpose of my new blog was to be a record of my research.

    This bit stood out for me…

    “The people you wanted to talk to didn’t want to talk to you. The survey return was low. These disappointments and messy bits have to be tracked.”

    …and it is important for me to write about this stuff so thank you for your guidance.


  5. Thanks – I find your post on data analysis so useful – I think it’s an area where qual methodology texts so often let you down!

    My research diary is pretty oldschool – just longhand notes collated in a folder which contain a pretty free-flowing record of the whole PhD process.
    When Im dealing with data however, I also have analytic notes – a running record of my thoughts as I process & organise my data.
    I find these notes become the jumping off point for my analysis – and looking back over these in cross-reference with my research diary gives me a pretty full idea of what influenced me to take a certain direction…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s