SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELETLOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
CopyrightPatter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology ethics examiner introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review literature themes mess methods chapter peer review PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research methods research project revision signposts supervision Tate Summer School thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
- managing the #phd – reMIND me
- paper not working? try the “what’s the problem?” approach
- what did that peer reviewer actually mean?
- data analysis – jigsaw puzzling writ large?
- Co-writing, a continuing story…
- 2017 – the year of the ‘to do’ list
- dear Santa
- co-writing strategies – or – what could possibly go wrong?
- an ethics of analysis and writing
- letter to an unknown doctoral researcher
- good academic writing – what’s your list?
- ask not how but why – musings on ‘the interview’
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- managing the #phd - reMIND me
- paper not working? try the "what's the problem?" approach
- concluding the journal article
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- writing an academic ransom note
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- what’s with the name doctoral ‘student’?
- connecting chapters/chapter conclusions
Category Archives: refereeing
This is a story told against myself. It’s about doing something that I really, really shouldn’t have done. Before I go on I will just say that the story is actually pretty trivial in the overall state of the world, … Continue reading
So you’ve sent the paper into the journal and now the referee comments are in your in-box. You finally pluck up the courage to open the email and what do you find? Contradictory comments. Not helpful. Not at all. We … Continue reading
I’ve written about rejections several times, and most of this is scattered throughout the blog, so I thought it might be helpful to amalgamate the most important points together. All in one place. There are some very common reasons why … Continue reading
Having read the article carefully, and decided whether it’s accept without change, revise and resubmit or reject, there is now the task of writing the feedback to the author/s. There are four things to keep in mind when writing feedback: … Continue reading
Journals always ask reviewers to recommend whether an article should be published as is, or whether the writer should do small or large revisions. They also ask if the article should be rejected outright. Making a publication recommendation can feel … Continue reading