-
SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELET
LOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patterFollow me on Twitter
My Tweetspatter on facebook
Copyright
Patter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging book proposal books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers epistemology ethics examiner introduction journal journal article literature review literature themes mess methods chapter peer review PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research methods research project revision signposts supervision Tate Summer School thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
-
Recent Posts
- #co-editing – a manuscript to publication checklist
- #co-editing – getting the proposal together
- another year, another post
- #readingforwriting: being specific in qualitative research
- academic publishing in English
- you’re so vague…
- making the familiar strange – two book recommendations
- three things examiners look for in methods chapters
- blogging in the growlery
- when peer review is scent marking
- finding your people online – PhD and ECR parents
- have a good research ride
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- good academic writing – it's about revision not editing
- refereeing a journal article. part 1: reading
- #co-editing - a manuscript to publication checklist
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
- making a summary #literatureknowhow
- connecting chapters/chapter introductions
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- concluding the journal article
- what not to do in a thesis conclusion, part one: christmas present five
Meta
Category Archives: contribution
writing course – common problems in the Results/Discussion Section
It’s always as well to know what can go wrong when writing a journal article. And there are multiple areas in any paper to think about. Just because there seem to be fewer conventions for the Results/Discussion section doesn’t mean … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, argument, contribution, discussion, headings, results
Tagged academic writing problems, journal article, Pat Thomson, results
3 Comments
preparing for the PhD oral exam
As a supervisor it is part of my job to help doctoral researchers prepare for their viva. I’ve not done one myself, as Australian PhDs are typically examined by means of a long report from two or three examiners. However, … Continue reading
three reasons why editing a book is a good idea
Is it worth editing a book? I’ve been asked this question a couple of times recently. It’s actually not an easy question, as you might guess. That’s because the answer depends on all kinds of things, including where you are … Continue reading
Posted in academic book, collaboration, contribution, editing, profile
Tagged collaboration, connection, editing books, Pat Thomson, profile
6 Comments
who wants to read about my place?
I’ve recently been in Iceland working on an academic writing course. The participants were doctoral researchers. They came with data that they wanted to turn into a peer reviewed paper. The majority of them were doing PhDs by publication so … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, contribution, conversation, journal, local, PhD by publication
Tagged contribution, international, journal, local, Pat Thomson
5 Comments
quotations – handle with care
Quotations are dangerous. The way that you use quotations can give away whether you think you are still writing as a student, or writing as an expert scholar in your own right. Student assignments are often heavily strewn with quotations. … Continue reading
Posted in authority in writing, contribution, quotations
Tagged Pat Thomson, quotation, writing with authority
13 Comments
the literature review – how old are the sources?
I recently had an email from a colleague asking me what I would do if I was examining a thesis and the vast majority of the literatures were over ten years old. Would this be a problem? What would I … Continue reading
Posted in contribution, literature review, location
Tagged age of sources, contribution, literature review, location, Pat Thomson
17 Comments
making authoritative claims
Compared to – let’s say journalists for argument’s sake – we academics are generally a lot less prepared to say anything for absolute certain. Why do we do this? Do we simply love complexity and being vague? Well of course … Continue reading
Posted in academic writing, authority in writing, claim, contribution, hedges
Tagged authoritative writing, claims, hedges, Pat Thomson
8 Comments
