SEE MY CURATED POSTS ON WAKELETLOOKING FOR POSTS ON WRITING FOR JOURNALS? REVISING AND EDITING? GIVING FEEDBACK AND REVIEWING? READING? GIVING A CONFERENCE PAPER? VISIT MY WAKES ON https://wakelet.com/@patter
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
CopyrightPatter by Pat Thomson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at Patricia.Thomson@nottingham.ac.uk.
- abstracts academic blogging academic book academic writing argument authority in writing blogging books book writing chapter co-writing conclusion conference conference papers conference presentation contribution crafting writing data dissertation doctoral education doctoral research early career researchers editing ethics examiner introduction journal journal article literature mapping literature review methods chapter peer review PhD public engagement publishing reader reading research research methods research project revision revision strategy supervision Tate Summer School theory thesis time Uncategorized voice writing
- theory fright – part one
- getting to grips with ‘the paragraph’
- revising with a reader in mind – ten questions
- from description to analysis – a revision strategy
- revising a thesis chapter
- check for ‘code words’ – revising your writing
- me, myself and I
- parents who study
- the challenges of revision
- writing more than one thing at the same time – part three, managing
- writing more than one thing at the same time – part two, authoring
- writing more than one thing at the same time – part one, connecting
Top Posts & Pages
- aims and objectives - what's the difference?
- revising with a reader in mind - ten questions
- theory fright - part one
- writing the introduction to a journal article
- getting to grips with 'the paragraph'
- using metacommentary to specify your contribution: christmas present three
- writing a bio-note
- concluding the journal article
- I can't find anything written on my topic... really?
- the literature review - how old are the sources?
Category Archives: contribution
My Nordic colleagues often say that the thesis has to have a red thread, a line of argument that holds things together. So what’s this red thread? Think of the red thread as a sturdy rope that guides the reader … Continue reading
It’s always as well to know what can go wrong when writing a journal article. And there are multiple areas in any paper to think about. Just because there seem to be fewer conventions for the Results/Discussion section doesn’t mean … Continue reading
As a supervisor it is part of my job to help doctoral researchers prepare for their viva. I’ve not done one myself, as Australian PhDs are typically examined by means of a long report from two or three examiners. However, … Continue reading
Is it worth editing a book? I’ve been asked this question a couple of times recently. It’s actually not an easy question, as you might guess. That’s because the answer depends on all kinds of things, including where you are … Continue reading
I’ve recently been in Iceland working on an academic writing course. The participants were doctoral researchers. They came with data that they wanted to turn into a peer reviewed paper. The majority of them were doing PhDs by publication so … Continue reading